logo
Call us: +44 (0)1865 244727

  • Home
  • Scope
  • News
  • Products
    • RADAR
    • CALL-OFF PROJECTS
  • Clients
  • Contact
  • How we work
    • Independent
      • Common law orthodoxies
      • Sensationalism
      • Expert witness
      • Regulation and Politics
      • Tied services
    • Up-to-date
      • Timely
      • Insurance Scenarios
      • Probabilistic Methods
    • Expert
      • Personal Injury
      • Trends
    • Innovative
  • Database
    • Member’s login
    • Member’s Settings
    • Register
    • RADAR Database
  • Recent projects
    • EMFs
    • STRESS AT WORK
    • WHIPLASH
    • WELDING RODS: MANGANESE EXPOSURE
    • ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
    • Other Projects



HSE: Do we need it?

Jun 26, 2013
by Andrew@Reliabilityoxford.co.uk
0 Comment
Evidence from:

DWP 14th June 2013

A review of the health and safety executive as a non-departmental public body

HSE annual budget is ~£3oom. That is roughly equivalent to 20% of the EL insurance premium collected in the same operational area. HSE have contact with 60% of employers every 3 years, insurers have contact with 85% of employers every year (15% don’t buy EL even when they should, HSE and local authorities are not always great at compliance).

HSE claim to have saved the UK from unnecessary costs that would have followed from EC Directives had they not been intercepted. This, political work in addition to its main activities, which are:

• Lead others to improve health and safety in the workplace;
• Provide an effective regulatory framework;
• Secure compliance with the law; and,
• Reduce the likelihood of low frequency, high-impact catastrophic incidents.

The latter two would seem, in part, to require a non-commercial solution which is independent of political influence and other forms of bias. However, duty of care standards and an appropriate body of law could and should be provided by the courts. This is a common law country.

Insurers would have a direct interest in propagating, and assessing compliance with, duty of care standards that meet with public policy aims as produced by the courts. With an additional say £200m a year devoted to this, insurers could do at least as well as HSE.

With the Enterprise Act going through, there would be no need for both statutory and common law duty of care standards. In fact, having both could be positively uneconomic.

The problem would be in ensuring that insurers’ interests are aligned with those of policy-makers in government. Insurance would naturally focus most of its attention on cost effective interventions but these costs would be compensation costs, not national productivity ones.

The national productivity effect of HSE has not been established (well, at least not published). The national productivity effect of a new insurance-based system has not been established, but lessons could be learned from other nations where this is the norm.

That just leaves political sympathy as the deciding factor in this consultation exercise: Do we need HSE?

 

Social Share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

captcha *

Search Documents


Categories

  • Causation
    • de minimis
    • material contribution
  • Date of knowledge
  • Diagnosis
  • Duty of Care
  • Exposure estimation data
  • Mitigation
  • Motor related injury
  • News
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • November 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • November 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • November 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012

© Re: Liability (Oxford) Ltd. 2012. All rights reserved.
Website Design by The Big Picture